<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="podbean/3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moodle v Talmos</title>
	<link>http://moodle.podbean.com/2008/06/22/moodle-v-talmos/</link>
	<description>Moodle Musings from the Moodle Fairy</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://podbean.com/?v=3.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: D</title>
		<link>http://moodle.podbean.com/2008/06/22/moodle-v-talmos/#comment-132790</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://moodle.podbean.com/2008/06/22/moodle-v-talmos/#comment-132790</guid>
					<description>We have used, or rather had, Talmos for years, constantly requested features promised but they never came. Even something as simple as a link to email took months to be but on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have used, or rather had, Talmos for years, constantly requested features promised but they never came. Even something as simple as a link to email took months to be but on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Jones</title>
		<link>http://moodle.podbean.com/2008/06/22/moodle-v-talmos/#comment-114713</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://moodle.podbean.com/2008/06/22/moodle-v-talmos/#comment-114713</guid>
					<description>The version of Talmos referred to in the link is actually around two years old and the issues referred to don't relate directly to the product as it stands, rather to a disagreement about comments relating to the older version of the product.

Anyone interested, who is prepared to look with an open mind at the current version, would be welcome to email on info@talmos.net to arrange a discussion or demonstration.

As can be seen by the latest posts, there will be a discussion on July 6th where these issues will hopefully get a fair hearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The version of Talmos referred to in the link is actually around two years old and the issues referred to don&#8217;t relate directly to the product as it stands, rather to a disagreement about comments relating to the older version of the product.</p>
<p>Anyone interested, who is prepared to look with an open mind at the current version, would be welcome to email on <a href="mailto:info@talmos.net">info@talmos.net</a> to arrange a discussion or demonstration.</p>
<p>As can be seen by the latest posts, there will be a discussion on July 6th where these issues will hopefully get a fair hearing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
